Breitbart News is reporting that the ever unhelpful United Nations is working to get all of the would be immigrants that signed up for the Migrant Protection Protocols (Remain in Mexico policy), into the United States.

United Nations agencies have begun efforts to return asylum seekers currently residing in Mexico under the Trump Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) back to U.S. soil. An estimated 25,000 asylum seekers are eligible for transfer under President Joe Biden’s cancellation of the MPP. The UN received 12,000 applications over a three-day period beginning February 19.

So the question is why? The UN is not really known to be completely altruistic in its goals. A quick look at the oil for food program coordinated by the multinational government tells us that. So what do they get out of pushing thousands of immigrants into the US?

It doesn’t take a lot of searching to find where the UN links up with immigration. Back in the olden days, meaning a couple of decades ago, the UN pooped out something called Agenda 21. They basically rounded a bunch of representatives from member states and tried to figure out how they (the UN) could take charge. This is where it was decided that the climate would be their vehicle to power. Here is how it is framed by our betters:

Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.

There are a couple of key points in that sentence. The plan of action was adopted by the UN, governments, and major groups. What they mean is commercial entities and government partnerships. So, industry would join up with governments and the UN to implement this (Facebook and Twitter for a small example). The other key point is that it can be implemented globally, nationally, or locally. They knew that most of the US would not buy into this so they went to local governments and asked them to sign up. A lot of them did. Here is a listing of cities that signed on to the UN plan as of 2013. A lot of cities realized late in the game that this was not really about the environment and started pulling out, so I don’t know where it stands at this moment.

After being outed for what it was, it started to fall apart. But, such a large bureaucracy is not going to give up its domination schemes easily. So they regrouped and came up with something that sounds brand new, but is really just the same. Here is the new and hot Agenda 2030:

Echoing human security principles, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development emphasizes a “world free of poverty, hunger, disease and want … free of fear and violence … with equitable and universal access to quality education, health care and social protection … to safe drinking water and sanitation … where food is sufficient, safe, affordable and nutritious … where habits are safe, resilient and sustainable … and where there is universal access to affordable, reliable and sustainable energy.”

It calls for development strategies that result in resilient societies where people are safe from chronic threats such as abject poverty, hunger, disease, violence and repression, and protected from sudden and hurtful disruptions in their daily lives.

Making up this agenda are 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs). They are the standard claptrap of lofty sounding ideals. Things like ending poverty in all forms, clean water, jobs for all, bla, bla. Who could be against any of that? It shares a lot of the same goals as the hard left groups of the world. You can’t guarantee a job unless you have someone that provides it. It is the same with a lot of these great sounding basic rights. You have to remove some rights of some to give something to others.

Not to get sidetracked. Here is the big clencher for the UN:

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development recognizes for the first time the contribution of migration to sustainable development. 11 out of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) contain targets and indicators relevant to migration or mobility. The Agenda’s core principle is to “leave no one behind,” not even migrants.

The SDGs’ central reference to migration is made in target 10.7: to facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people, including through the implementation of planned and well-managed migration policies. Other targets directly related to migration mention trafficking, remittances, international student mobility and more. Moreover, migration is indirectly relevant to many more cross-cutting targets.

So 11 of the 17 goals depend on the mass movement  of people. It seems to me that if you thwart the UN’s plan for immigration, you can bring the whole thing to a halt. This is really a part of the big income inequality shell game. One way to redistribute wealth is to move money to the people. The Paris Climate accords take care of that angle. The other side of that coin is to move people to the money.

So like all the world’s elite ideas, bringing as many legal, or illegal, poor immigrants into the US is a march towards their socialist utopia.